Pages

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

stuff

I'm a little bummed that nobody commented on my awesome Tigers post last week. I'm just going on blind faith that somebody other than me might have read it.

Also, I've abandoned the Top 50 NBA list, mostly because I was sure nobody except me was going to read it. There were no Pistons in the top 50 (none in the top 100 actually) and a long list of good players who have missed most of the season due to injury. The crammed schedule is really proving to be a mistake; too many injuries, too much sloppy play, too much fatigue.

It's a shame that the NBA is freefalling in popularity, because it hasn't been this good in 15 years. There are at least 6 likeable, young superstars - Dwight Howard, Derrick Rose, Kevin Durant, Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, Kevin Love - and those players alone make the NBA a better product than it was in the treacherous Iverson/McGrady days, when the thug reputation was well-deserved. But nowadays, it's chic to wear nerdy glasses and an expensive suit. The only thing Durant has in common with Iverson is scoring production.

Of course, I didn't even mention the league's three most popular players - LeBron, Kobe, and Jeremy Lin - or the winning-obsessed veterans like Duncan, Nash, Nowitzki and Garnett ... or the charming up-and-comers like John Wall, Kyrie Irving, Ricky Rubio, Russell Westbrook... or the fringe-superstar group of Carmelo, Amare, Rondo, Pierce, Wade, Bosh, Gasol, Deron Williams.

Sure, there are a few bad apples in the bunch, but most of the me-first thugs who nearly ruined the NBA (fools like Stephon Marbury) are long gone. LeBron may be an incredibly selfish person, but he's an unselfish player. The NBA is in a better place than it's been since MJ retired, and hopefully it will stay that way.

All that being said, the current trend of superstars joining forces is really, really, REALLY lame, and makes me not want to watch a minute of the playoffs. When Dwight Howard and Deron Williams join together next year (on either the Mavs, Lakers or Nets), it's gonna be super uncool. The Miami Heat Effect is probably my second least favorite thing in sports right now, behind the BCS.

Speaking of college football, we're less than two months from the Draft and that means I'm gearing up for my annual mock draft. Last year I whiffed almost as badly as the Lions did with the Nick Fairley pick.

Seriously, I'm not a Fairley hater, I think he'll make a solid starter when we lose Corey Williams, but there were four guys that would have been far better picks: Mike Pouncey, Anthony Castonzo, Gabe Carimi, Prince Amukamara. All of those guys made more sense for Detroit, and all of those guys will have much better careers than Fairley. Pouncey might be the 2nd best center in football.

The top overall pick in this draft is locked in, and anybody who thinks the Colts are considering RG3 is crazy. Andrew Luck will be a Colt just as certainly as Peyton Manning won't be.

The 2nd pick is totally up for grabs: the Rams have announced their intentions to trade it, and whoever offers the most will attain Robert Griffin III. The top bidders are Miami, Cleveland and Washington, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone else slips their name in sneakily. Presumably, Cleveland has the most to offer (two 1st round picks), but with as many holes as they have on their roster, it might be wise to keep their picks and keep rebuilding around McCoy. Washington also has a myriad of needs, though Mike Shanahan wouldn't agree; Miami has the best roster of teams believed to be interested in Griffin, and thus might be willing to offer the most for the #2 pick. At least that's my presumption.

A huge factor might be Peyton Manning's whereabouts. If he signs with a team prior to the draft, it'll obviously take them out of the running. His most rumored destinations are Miami and Washington, with a dash of the Cardinals, Jets and Titans, and I wouldn't count out anybody else who isn't completely happy with their quarterback.

But my best guess is that Manning won't be healthy enough to get any guaranteed money from anybody in the next two months, and if I had to bet on it, I'd say his career is over. Who knows. It probably won't factor into the Draft, but it could.

After Luck and Griffin go off the board, the Vikings get the first pick among non-quarterbacks. The decision should be an easy one (Matt Kalil, LT), but I'm holding out hope that they stupidly pick WR Justin Blackmon or CB Morris Claiborne. Then at pick #4 is Cleveland (or St. Louis if they trade). This will probably be Blackmon either way.

The #5 pick is very enigmatic right now. Tampa and new head coach Greg Schiano (the unknown guy from Rutgers) have needs all over the field. Claiborne probably makes the most sense if he's available, but I wouldn't be shocked to see Schiano make a bold move and take RB Trent Richardson or even an offensive lineman, possibly Jonathan Martin or Riley Reiff.

At #6 is Washington, assuming they don't trade up to #2. Given Shanahan's stupidity, this pick is likely to be a disaster. Common sense would say to pick Blackmon or Claiborne if they are available, or Reiff/Martin if not. But something tells me Shanahan will try to be real sly and will take Shit McGritt who was supposed to go in the 3rd round. Who knows. Maybe Kirk Cousins.

I'll continue the rest of the mock draft at a later date ... it's really hard to figure out the Lions at pick #23. It's foreign territory picking so late. With LeShoure and Fairley coming back healthy, the Lions feel like they've already got 2 first round picks under contract, which is awesome. This pick should be a CB or offensive lineman, but we all know how logical Jim Schwartz is with draft picks. He'll probably continue his love affair with pass-rushers and take an OLB or DE, which isn't completely stupid considering how lousy VandenBosch was by the end of the year. But there are bigger needs. And there's no depth in the secondary or on the O-line. There's tons of depth at DE and LB.

We'll have to see what happens with Cliff Avril and Stephen Tulloch though. If one or both of them are gone, that changes things. My guess is still that we lose Avril but keep Tulloch. That's what I'm hoping for.

Go Lions.
Go Ron Paul!

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Thoughts on Tigers 2012

The loss of Victor Martinez was devastating. The addition of Prince Fielder, miraculous.

Heading into 2012, the Tigers are the overwhelming favorites to win the AL Central, anchored by three MVP candidates in Justin Verlander, Miguel Cabrera, and Fielder. They have a closer who went 49 for 49 in save opportunities, All Stars at catcher and shortstop, a solid pitching rotation, and a top 10 bullpen according to MLB.com. They've got good lefties, good righties, and a couple of elite defensive players. Unfortunately, they've also got Jim Leyland, looming over the whole project like a rain cloud.

With the three-headed monster of JV, Miggy and Prince, the Tigers are built to terrify opponents. No team in the Majors has a trio of stars to rival Detroit. And yet, the chinks in the armor are plentiful and no skipper could expose them more clumsily than Jimmy Smokes.

Let's break things down and offer a few thoughts and predictions:

Offense

The team's primary strength is the bats of Cabrera and Fielder, who combined for 68 homers and 225 RBI last year. Cabby bats right, Prince bats left, and both guys hit for average. As long as both players stay healthy, the offense will thrive.

But whether Detroit clinches the AL Central in July or September will be largely determined by the rest of the offense, namely the black holes at 1, 8 and 9.

Hitting in the 2-hole will likely be Brennan Boesch, who loves to bat in front of Cabrera. Hitting 5 and 6 will be Peralta and Avila on most nights, and that sequence of five batters is as good as any in baseball. But Leyland's primary objective this year has to be improving production from the leadoff spot and the bottom 3 batters in the lineup. Last year, those spots probably batted around .230 with little to no power; I'd grade them somewhere around a D+.

If Austin Jackson and Ryan Raburn can stop striking out and at least force opposing pitchers to work, it will open things up tremendously. And of course, Brandon Inge cannot be permitted to play one single inning in a Tigers jersey this year. (Just found out Inge is being considered for the everyday job at 2nd. Excuse me while I go outside and bury my face in the snow).

The rest of the offense will be a shuffle between Andy Dirks, Ramon Santiago, Don Kelly, Clete Thomas, and some promising youngsters like Castellanos and Santos. Delmon Young is still a Tiger but reportedly doesn't want to DH, so his departure might be forthcoming.

That brings up the biggest issue of the season. Who is the Tigers DH?
If Leyland sticks to his strategy of playing Cabrera at 3rd, that is.

With Magglio gone, there's no obvious defensive liability, and no big fat slow guy. It could be Boesch occassionally, or Delmon if he stays on the team, or Peralta on some nights if Santiago can play shortstop. It could also be Raburn with Santiago at 2nd, or Clete if Leyland wants to go lefty-heavy. It'll also be Avila once every week or two, as long as Santos doesn't completely suck. And if Castellanos plays well at 3rd, we'll see Miggy in the DH spot regularly too.

So all that to say, here's my prediction: the 2012 Tigers will break the Major League record for 'Most Different Players in the DH Spot in a Single Season.'

I've done a bunch of searching and can't figure out what the record is, but whatever it is, I think Leyland will manufacture enough roster-tinkering bullcrap to break it.

We all saw Leyland's masterpiece last year, when he didn't use the same starting lineup two games in a row until August. He made mid-game substitutions in every single game, usually in the 8th or 9th inning, and he hit players like Raburn and Kelly in every different spot in the order except clean-up, all in the vain effort to turn .220 batters into .290 batters.

It didn't work.

Leyland's lineup antics were pointless at best, infuriating at worst. If the old curmudgeon would have listened to fans and critics way back in May instead of waiting until July (when Dombroski mandated certain changes), the Tigers would have clinched their division - the worst division in baseball - at least 30 days earlier than they did.

But no, every day we were treated to an enigma of a lineup, asking ourselves questions like "Why does Boesch need a rest? He just had a day off last week and he's only 24 years old!" Or, "Why the heck is Raburn batting 3rd?" Or my personal favorite, "Why is Inge hitting ahead of Avila??!??"

This year, it's folly to think Leyland will change. He won't. We'll see Cabrera at the DH spot and Inge starting at 3rd within a week, and we'll see Cabby at 3rd and Fielder hitting DH within two weeks. Then we'll see Clete DH, then Boesch, then Raburn, then Avila, then Dirks, then Mike Ilitich. The addition of Prince Fielder, while magnificent, gives Leyland the perfect excuse to micromanage this offense into oblivion.

To play devil's advocate, I honestly don't know what I would do in Leyland's position. There isn't a great answer for the DH conundrum. I agree with Cabby at 3rd, at least until he starts leading the league in errors. I'd probably try like crazy to keep Delmon Young and convince him to be a great DH, while Boesch, AJ, and Dirks play the outfield. Whatever I'd do, I'd make a decision to be consistent. Leyland detests consistency.

And so, for better or worse, get ready to see 15 different Tigers in the Designated Hitter position in 2012. The lineup will look completely different from night to night, depending on the opposing pitcher's handedness and horoscope.


...Oh, I almost forgot. Leyland brought back his favorite player, good old Gerald Laird. You may remember him as the guy who hit .207 back in 2010. I know this will shock you, but Leyland thinks he can take a useless hitter and revitalize him. We all saw how great that worked with Inge last year, going from a .089 average in June to a sparkling .200 in August.

Also should mention that Wilson Betemit signed with the Orioles, Casper Wells went to Seattle, Will Rhymes is in Tampa, and Guillen and Magglio are currently looking for jobs. Danny Worth (utility infielder) is still on the roster.

Overall, the offense is probably a 92 out of 100, as it stands now.

If Inge doesn't play a game all year, and if Jackson's OBP can get up around .330 (.345 as a rookie, .317 last year), and if Avila and Peralta and Boesch continue playing how they played last year, and if quick baserunners like Dirks and Santiago and AJax are allowed to use their speed once in a while, and if Leyland stays out of his own way and plays the best 9 guys each night, this offense could be a 97 out of 100, by far the best in baseball.

Or, if none of those things happen, and Leyland manages like an asshole again, our offense will be a mid-to-high 80s and we'll still dominate the AL Central.

Pitching and Defense

We can't count on another MVP season by Verlander, but we can certainly count on him being the best pitcher in baseball again. The AL Cy Young is his to lose.

Doug Fister was unbelievably good as soon as the Tigers traded for him, going 8-1 and allowing two or fewer runs in 10 of his 11 starts. The only exception was a brutal game against Baltimore where the Orioles racked up 12 hits, but I'm willing to call that an anomaly. Fister is easily the best #2 starter in the AL if he pitches the way he pitched late last season.

Max Scherzer and Rick Porcello were basically the same guy last year; Max had an ERA of 4.43 and a WHIP (walks+hits/inning pitched) of 1.35, while Porcello compiled a 4.75 and 1.41. Both pitchers were very inconsistent, at times looking dominant and at times looking terrible. They probably won't change much this year, as both pitchers have a limited arsenal of pitches. But for a third and fourth starter, they're good enough.

Brad Penny was a notch worse than Max and Rick. His ERA was a respectable 4.61 midway through the season, but in the final months of the year he fell apart, hurling a 6.75 ERA in September. He pitched less than 2 innings in the postseason, and allowed 5 runs and 7 hits. He's now a member of the Fukuoka Hawks.

Before Fister's arrival, and even after his arrival, the fifth spot in the rotation was a mess last year. Phil Coke got the first 14 starts and did pretty lousy before heading back to the bullpen; Duane Below, Andrew Oliver, and Charlie Furbush got 2 starts apiece and combined to go 1-4 with a +5 ERA.

The answer for the 5th starter is former 1st round pick Jacob Turner, who showed flashes of his potential last year in his first career start. Turner went 5 innings against the Angels, allowing 3 hits and 1 run, with 6 pretty awesome strikeouts. Then Leyland took Turner out too early, put in Cokey, and Detroit lost 5-1. Turner has been deemed untradeable by Dombrowski for the last two seasons, and has been compared to a young Verlander because of his size, poise, overpowering fastball and developing curveball. Sure, Turner has bust potential, but he also has potential to be the Tigers missing piece and give them the best starting rotation in the AL.

The bullpen was probably the weakest aspect of the 2011 Tigers, other than the bats of Inge and Jackson. Valverde was half-amazing, half-lucky, while Joaquin Benoit stunk for two months and then pitched 22 straight scoreless innings. Al Albuquerque showed a lot of promise, but got hurt three times and now he's out for the year. Daniel Schlereth was pretty below-average, and so were Ryan Perry, David Purcey and Brad Thomas. Coke was a decent addition to the bullpen midway through the year, but he's not exactly a stud.

The big addition this offseason was Octavio Dotel, a 38 year old Dominican who has pitched for 12 different MLB teams and tossed more than 800 innings in his career. His lifetime ERA is a modest 3.74, with a 1.24 WHIP. Dotel isn't stunning, but he's probably got another solid season in his arm and can be the 7th inning guy Detroit needs.

Defensively, the Tigers are anchored by arguably the best center fielder in the league and an elite catcher, but that's pretty much where the star power ends. Boesch and Dirks are capable outfielders, and Prince is a solid first baseman. Peralta and Cabrera are going to struggle, and the 2nd baseman platoon is average at best.

Look for Leyland to insert Santiago and/or Kelly and/or Inge late in close games, moving Cabby to DH. I'm okay with that as long as it doesn't screw up the offense, but it usually does. My personal opinion is - who cares about defense if you can score 8 runs a game? Play the best batters and score the most runs. But Leyland LOVES defense to the same irrational degree that he loves players like Laird and Perry. We'll see more defensive substitutions than we can count.

Overall Prediction

The Tigers went 95-67 last year, thanks in large part to a 12 game winning streak in September. They won the AL Central by 15 games, but it took a lot of wallowing in mediocrity before finally blowing away the under-talented Indians and White Sox.

Detroit was 4th in the AL in runs, 3rd in average, 7th in home runs, dead-last in stolen bases, 5th in strikeouts, 5th in walks. They lose the .330 average of Victor Martinez, but replace him with the .299 average of Prince Fielder, who was 2nd in the NL in home runs, 3rd in slugging percentage, 2nd in RBI, 2nd in walks, and 1st in intentional walks.

No doubt, we'll miss Martinez's ability to get hits with guys on base. His BA with runners in scoring position was the best in baseball. We'll miss his ability to work pitch counts and advance runners. But what we lose in batting average we gain in power, and in fear. Nobody really pitched around Cabrera last year with Victor behind him, but they'll be even more scared this year. Cabrera is the #1 rated player in fantasy baseball for a very good reason, and that reason is Prince Fielder.

The 2011 pitching staff ranked 7th in the AL (out of 14 teams) in terms of ERA with a 4.04. We were 8th in strikeouts, 8th in walks, 8th in WHIP, and 6th in strikeouts/walk. Obviously, those numbers aren't very good when you consider we had a pitcher who went 24-5 with a 2.40 ERA, a 0.92 WHIP, and led the Majors in strikeouts by 20. A large part of the problem was the bullpen, but the starters weren't faultless.

It's unrealistic to think Detroit will improve in every single statistic without falling behind in other places, but I do think Detroit's a better team on offense and in pitching. Jacob Turner could be an invaluable addition, and removing Inge from the everyday lineup is almost as helpful as adding Fielder. I have an ugly feeling that somebody from the offense is going to completely fall apart for no good reason (my hunch is maybe Peralta), but I hope that doesn't happen.

My regular season prediction is 103-59, the best record in the AL and 15 games ahead of second place in the AL Central - surprising Kansas City. Maybe a tad brash, but we'll see. I think Cabrera finishes second in MVP voting to some chump like Evan Longoria or Eric Hosmer, JV narrowly loses the Cy Young to Dan Haren, and Turner completes the 2nd Place Trifecta by finished second for ROY to some guy I've not yet heard of. Leyland will inexplicably win Manager of the Year despite his feeble attempts to destroy the Tigers, and I'm going to hold off making any playoff predictions right now so I don't look stupid.

Go Tigers!

First game is April 5 vs Boston.

NFL season recap

Nailed the Super Bowl pick of Giants by 4, even though the game didn't play out exactly how I thought. But I was pretty close: 'Patriots go up, Eli comes back, Pats D is terrible, hailmary falls incomplete.' Funny this, in retrospect, was neither team deserved to be in the Super Bowl. Ravens-49ers would have been much better. The Giants were a 9-7 team in a crappy division, and the Pats' defense was akin to the 2008 Lions. Kind of a dumb ending to a great season.

Can't wait for the April draft (otherwise called the RG3 lovefest), the revival of Tebowmania, the Lions trying to fill some holes in free agency, a weird season of fantasy football where there's more great tight ends than running backs, the rookie campaigns of Luck and Griffin, and of course, the start of the 2012 season. Right now my Super Bowl pick is Texans v. Packers.

I'm even excited about the 'Where Will Peyton Manning Play?' saga.

I finished this season 137-128-10 against the spread (51.7%) , and 179-86 straight-up (67.5%).

Pretty awesome straight-up, but I was 54.1% last year ATS, so a little disappointed there. Two years ago when I picked straight-up I also went 67%.

Also, since I began doing picks, I am 3-0 ATS (and 3-0 straight-up) in Super Bowls.


Working on a Top 50 NBA list which nobody cares about ...
Also uber-excited about the Tigers.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Thoughts on Super Bowl and some other stuff

Sorry I've been slacking lately and haven't written anything on here. To be honest, I'm not really that excited about the Super Bowl. I have this dreadful feeling that the Giants are going to pull off another upset and Eli is going to considered a first ballot Hall of Famer by the end of February. This morning, John Clayton said that if not for Brees and Rodgers, Eli would have been the league's MVP this year. Really??? With a 9-7 record and the 7th best QB rating in the league? With fewer yards, TDs, and fewer wins than Stafford? Not to mention Tom Brady?

I'm okay with saying Eli was a top 8 MVP candidate this year, but clearly there are at least 4 quarterbacks who had better seasons, and Calvin, McCoy and Ray Rice belong above Eli in MVP voting as well. What Clayton said was basically like someone on Fox News saying, "If you don't count Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, Rick Perry could be the next President."

You can't just discount Rodgers and Brees. That makes no sense. Whatever.

By the way, I am officially on the Ron Paul bandwagon, even though the GOP nomination is between Frankenstein and Susan Boyle. (aka Romney and Gingrich)

Speaking of people who look like Newt Gingrich, have you seen this? Haunting.

Anyway, here's the Super Bowl pick.

Patriots (15-3) @ Giants (12-7)
Line: NE by 3

Patriots have won 10 straight; Giants have won 5 in a row. But the Giants road to the championship (Atlanta, @Green Bay, @San Fran) was a billion times more difficult than New England's (BYE, BYE, home against Baltimore who missed a 32 yard field goal which would have forced overtime). Gronkowski has a high ankle sprain, the Giants D is completely healthy and playing better than they've played in years, and Brady is coming off one of his worst playoff games ever. Oh, and the Pats secondary looks as bad as ever, giving up their standard 300+ yards to a mediocre quarterback last week.

I see New England coming out fast, with a smart gameplan of quick passes and screens designed to counter the Giants' vaunted pass rush. Giving Belichick two weeks to prepare usually leads to some high-scoring first halves. Brady should get his groove on early, and the Pats will be up 24-13 at half.

But Coughlin has a knack for adjustments and New England's defense has a knack for collapses, so I expect the Giants to come back, slowly but surely, until there's 4:00 left in the 4th quarter and Eli leads the 90 yard drive to tie the game at 34. Then, Brady drives down, stalls in the red zone, and the Pats kick a field goal with too much time left. Up 3 with 1:15 left, New England kicks off, and Victor Cruz does the rest, as the Giants easily march down the field for 7 and leave Brady with just 20 seconds and trailing 37-41. The hailmary falls incomplete, Eli collects his second title in Peyton's house, and I throw up in my mouth.

Giants 41-37.



In other news, the Tigers got Prince Fielder, Peyton Manning's career in Indy is over, and I seem to be the only person who cares about the NBA this season. Both of my fantasy basketball teams are kicking butt.

I'm considering my annual 50 Best Players in the NBA list, but it's still a work in progress.

Go Timberwolves.



Friday, January 20, 2012

Round 3 Playoff Picks

5-3 so far in the playoffs for both ATS and straight-up picks, making me 136-128-10 on the entire season, and 178-86 straight-up, with three games to go. This weekend's games are both really tricky.

Ravens @ Patriots
Predicted Line: NE by 6.5
Actual Line: NE by 7

When in serious doubt about the outcome of a game, I usually take the points. I don't think enough people are seeing Baltimore as a legit title contender. Sure, Joe Flacco looks like Sylar from Heroes but with the worst mustache in human history . And true, he completed less than 20 passes per game this season. But let's be honest about the Baltimore offense: it revolves around Ray Rice, an elite fullback, and a really competent offensive line. When Flacco does throw, it's not dink and dump; he takes deep shots and he usually completes one or two of them per game. When you're going against an almost historically bad secondary, it stands to reason that Flacco should find Torrey Smith for 40+ yards at least once, maybe twice. New England couldn't stop anybody late this season - not Rex Grossman, not Matt Moore, not even Dan Orlovsky, who put up 353 yards and completed 30 of 37 passes.

Last week, Tebow was an abomination. He had 3 completions in the first half, and he's the only starting QB in the NFL who could be that bad against New England's defense. Flacco could throw left-handed and do better than Tebow did. And I'm not bashing Tebow ... it's just nice to have a decent throwing arm when you're playing against coverage guys who can't cover.

I think Flacco and Rice and Smith help Baltimore keep pace with Brady, who will make his share of plays but won't be having a scrimmage like last week. I expect Baltimore to create 2 or 3 turnovers and keep the game close. But I am taking the Pats straight up, mainly because they're at home. I actually think Baltimore is the better team. But whatever, let's go Pats 28-26.

Giants @ 49ers
Predicted Line: SF by 3
Actual Line: SF by 2.5

Don't really feel great about either team, but I'll take the home squad. Niners by 4. I doubt the Harbaughs will go 0-2 this week, and I really don't see New York's defense stopping Frank Gore very well. Plus, Patrick Willis might be at the stage in his career where he single-handedly wills his teams to playoff victories. San Fran 24-20.

That's it ... go Lions.

Also, Victor Martinez is out for the season, so the Tigers season is over before it started. Who's going to hit behind Cabrera? Boesch? Avila? Anybody have any good lineup suggestions? My best shot looks like this:

1. A Jackson CF
2. D Young DH
3. M Cabrera 1B
4. B Boesch LF
5. A Avila C
6. J Peralta SS
7. A Dirks RF
8. R Santiago 2B
9. D Kelly 3B

That's pretty ugly without Martinez. Unless Detroit makes a big move in the next two months, we aren't going to win the Central. And if Inge is starting at third in the opener, I'll personally guarantee that I won't watch a single game until July.

Go lions...

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Playoffs Round 2, Plus a Look Ahead to April

Went 2-2 ATS and 3-1 straight up, missing badly on the Tebow game, which broke the record for Most Tweets Per Second. Literally. What is there to say about Tebow that hasn't already been said. Nothing. I'm so eternally glad that Pittsburgh is out.

Last year, my 3 least favorite teams were in the final 4 (PIT, CHI, NYJ). This year, I actually like all of the final 8 teams a decent amount, though the order of who I am cheering for goes like this:
1. New England
2. Denver
3. New Orleans
4. Green Bay
5. Houston
6. Baltimore
7. Giants
8. San Fran

I still love my preseason prediction of Saints over Packers in the NFC Championship. Nobody will see them coming as everyone overemphasizes the cold outdoor weather. I don't think Drew Brees will care. As for San Diego, they can all go suck a bunch of lemons.

Saints @ 49ers
Predicted Line: NO by 3.5
Actual Line: NO by 3.5

I'm taking the points. San Fran won't make it easy for Brees. Their defense is a million times better than Detroit's. I'll say Saints 30-27.

Broncos @ Patriots
Predicted Line: NE by 9.5
Actual Line: NE by 13.5

Pats have lost their first playoff game two years in a row. There's not a chance in hell that that happens again. Not against Tim Tebow.

This is a dreadful matchup for Denver. New England's D is actually decent against the run (Wilfork, Mayo), but can't stop the pass or rush the passer. Tebow might have lit up the Steelers with 10 completions for 300+ yards, but still, it was just 10 completions. That doesn't usually work. Not when the other quarterback is arguably The Greatest of All Time.

Patriots 41-23.

I should probably say something about Josh McDaniels, the former Pats coordinator who took the Denver job, drafted Tebow, got fired, took a job with the Rams, coordinated the worst offense in the NFL and possibly crushed Sam Bradford's career, and then quit to reunite with Brady and Belichick in the middle of the playoffs, right in time to face his former team and his former 1st round draft pick. What a coward. I would hate his guts if I were a Rams fan. I pretty much hate his guts anyway. He better not get one single ounce of credit for Brady's 5 TD game.

Texans @ Ravens
Predicted Line: BAL by 6.5
Actual Line: BAL 7.5

Both teams are looking to run the ball, control the clock, and play awesome defense. So this line has to be a little bit too high. Andre Johnson is supposedly fully healthy and Baltimore doesn't have anyone who can cover him. But I'll take the Ravens 24-20.

Giants @ Packers
Predicted Line: GB by 10.5
Actual Line: GB by 7.5

How about Packers 41-13.

... More to come later I guess ...

*Quick note on the NBA.

Ever since Joe Dumars traded Chauncey away and plunged the Pistons head-first into a septic tank, I have been searching for a new team to root for. I briefly entertained flings with the Bucks and Grizzlies and the Thunder, and early this season I was pretty excited about the Clippers. But I believe I have settled with a new love interest, and it may surprise you.

The Minnesota Timberwolves.

Yeah, they haven't been good since KG left 4 years ago, and yeah they were never really good before that. But I love Kevin Love (the hero of my fantasy team), I love rookie Derrick Williams, and I love Ricky Rubio. The supporting cast has all sorts of great characters - JJ Barea, Luke Ridnour, Michael Beasely, assistant coach Bill Laimbeer, and of course, Darko!

So that's my note about the NBA. Of course, my main routing interest is still the same: anybody but the Heat. Also, don't look now but with a new coach and a new GM the Pistons might be able to rebuild 2 or 3 years from now. They have two decent building blocks with Knight and Monroe. If they can keep those guys, keep Jerebko, and draft a mega-stud player to build around, they can compete in a few years. So basically, we need a top 3 pick and we need to not screw the pick up.

Back to the NFL.

The Lions are officially slotted as pick #23 on the Draft board, which means I've already begun the analysis process. Last year at pick #14 it was significantly later than we are used to picking. But #23 is crazy. I don't know how to function in a world where Detroit doesn't get a top 20 prospect. All this fantastic talent is leaving the silly world of college football and entering the NFL, and Detroit doesn't get any of it. Oh the woes of being a playoff team.

Making things worse for Detroit, two of the top QB prospects (Matt Barkley and Landry Jones) decided to stay in school for another year, presumably so they can battle for the right to be taken #1 in 2013. That means two less QBs will be taken in the top 20, which means two less OT/DE/LB/CBs will be available.

Of course, Mayhew and Lewand and Schwartz have made it clear that Detroit doesn't draft for need. Perhaps that's why Nick Fairley was the least effective rookie taken in the first round of 2011. Because he was coming off the freaking bench. Maybe this year the Lions will address any one of the 6 glaring positions of need (the four I mentioned, plus center and safety) with their first round pick, but based on history, we're more likely to take a backup QB or another freaking defensive tackle.

I'm starting to chart out a mock draft for April, but with still a lot left to be determined, I'm not getting ahead of myself. We know the Colts are taking Luck #1, and it will be very interesting to see if Peyton gets traded or retains the starting job. I'd like to see Indy keep him, but he's owed something like $28 million next year, so trading him is certainly sensible.

Teams that definitely need a new quarterback include the Redskins and Seahawks, but teams that aren't completely sold on their current starter will be a much longer list: Jets, Browns, Bills, Dolphins, Jaguars, Cardinals, Rams, Vikings, Bucs, Raiders, Chiefs, Broncos, 49ers, Titans ...

Really, less than half of the league (15 teams by my count) are happy with their current starting quarterback. Those teams are, in descending order, the Saints, Packers, Pats, Lions, Panthers, Steelers, Giants, Chargers, Bengals, Cowboys, Eagles, Texans, Falcons, Ravens, and Bears. And you could argue that 4 or 5 of those guys are replaceable if the right situation (namely, Peyton) was available.

So while only a few teams are in the Peyton market, probably upwards of 12 teams are in the market for the 2nd quarterback in the NFL Draft, Robert Griffin III. A lot of pundits think Griffin will be taken 2nd overall, not by the Rams, but by the highest bidder. The Browns (4th pick) stand to land Griffin if he drops, but with teams jockeying for position to move ahead of Cleveland, Cleveland might just want to move ahead of themselves. They have the most picks to make an offer that St. Louis can't deny.

However, the #2 prospect after Andrew Luck is a once-in-a-decade left tackle, Matt Kalil from USC. Kalil is considered a clone of Jake Long or Joe Thomas, and will probably be one of the best LTs in the NFL within one season. The Rams would be smart to ignore trade offers and take Kalil, which would give the Vikings (pick 3) the chance to hold an auction and amass picks.

That's what I see happening right now. I don't think St. Louis wants to trade out of pick #2 and lose the chance at Kalil. But there isn't a clear #3 prospect for the Vikings to take ... CB Claiborne from LSU or WR Blackmon from OSU are more of mid-first round pick type of talent. The Vikings very well might trade out of the 3 spot to the highest bidder, and end up addressing needs later in the draft, probably getting a future 1st rounder as well.

With the new rules of the CBA, teams actually won't be afraid to trade up into the top 5. Paying a top 5 pick is no longer a death sentence; it's actually the best way to rebuild. So expect the Robert Griffin bonanza to be crazy and teams to offer an arm, leg and a kidney to obtain his services. Whether he'll succeed in the NFL or not is a different story. I'm not convinced. Of course that's what I said about Cam Newton....

Anyway, my hope is the Lions will play it smart, address a need on the O-line or the defense, not do anything cute (like the stupid Pettigrew pick a few years ago), and get their asses back in the playoffs next year. Before the Draft, the key is going to be re-signing key players, namely Avril and Tulloch. We might not be able to afford both guys, so Tulloch is more vital in my mind than Avril, because we have no depth at linebacker.

That's all for now.

peace

Friday, January 6, 2012

Playoff Picks - Round 1

These are going to be insanely quick .... sorry in advance ...

Bengals (9-7) @ Texans (10-6)
Line: HOU by 2.5

Foster and the Texans D are the difference. Houston 23-16.

Lions (10-6) @ Saints (13-3)
Line: NO by 10.5

I've gotta at least take the points. I honestly believe the Lions have a chance. But I will say Saints 41-37.

Falcons (10-6) @ Giants (9-7)
Line: NYG by 3

Matt Ryan outside, no thanks. Giants 27-14.

Steelers (12-4) @ Broncos (8-8)
Line: PIT by 9

This line is fifteen points too low. Steelers 35-0. Sorry Tebow.


GO LIONS.